Tsitaat:Algselt postitas: levis
Teistest reaalsustest on tore kuulda, aga kas on õige neid jutte serveerida tõe pähe? Need on hüpoteesid ja sellest tuleks ka lähtuda.
ps.seda teemat lõhkuma hakata, siis saab kohe 4-5 eraldi teemat 
Muudetud: 13-1-08 kell 18:31:25 levis
Just äsja ilmus Monster Questil uus osa just nende roodide kohta.
Sai ka kohe rämeda kriitika endale kaela nende poolt, kes asjast rohkem teavad.
Saidil
http://www.roswellrods.com/ on kohe esilehel kirjas, tekst kus süüdistatakse Monster Questi suure osa paikapaneva tõestuse "hägustamises" või üldse välja jätmises. Arvatavasti see kaob sealt üpris pea, niisiis kopeerin laiale maailmale suunatud kaebekirja siia:
RODS DEBUNKED ON MONSTER QUEST
AND THE HISTORY CHANNEL
The series MONSTER QUEST presented "Mysterious Flying Creatures" with what I thought was going to bring forth the evidence on Rods other television shows have never presented.
I finally saw the the show tonight (Sunday January 13, 2008) or rather this morning at 2:30 am thanks to You Tube. First of all, I am very disappointed in the way I have yet again been treated by yet another network program posing as an honest investigative unit, (where in fact), it was all another ruse played on me by deliberately keeping the vital data "out of the reach of YOU the viewers."
First of all, MonsterQuest producer Tom Phillips told me at the "last minute" The History Channel re-edited the end of the show he produced. Ever since we shot the segments, I have "never" been allowed to see a script, nor a screener of the show.
This whole past year (2007) I have asked to see something, only to be told they don't allow it. That even he; "the producer" is not allowed to see the final show. I finally saw the show this morning and see how "they screwed us all again!" This time to my disappointment it was my "favorite Channel of all time" The History Channel that sold you the viewers the wrong goods!
NEVER have I ever thought The History Channel would have done this to Rods research.
1). They deliberately "glossed over" the Shuttle footage, by claiming debris. Neatly packed away and set aside. In depth analysis would have revealed more.
2). I handed them a photo taken by a professional photographer in the late 1980's at the Hughes Ranch in Nevada. It was not even introduced. Why? Because it would "kill" their insect claims. This is a shot of a Rod taken on "film" NOT interlaced video, but 35mm FILM! The photographer blew up the negative on a scanner thinking this was a speck of dust. It is a ROD! He testifies in court on images convicting people, so this man knows of what he speaks. This was deliberately left out.
3). The underwater footage was also glossed over, saying it could be a fish, yet they didn't go into the Rod that comes out of the ocean about a mile away from the camera, breaking water and going straight up into the air. Why? Because it would disrupt the new "edit" they made.
4). They spent all this time in this wind tunnel test checking the Rod flight models, yet they "again" glossed over the actual model NASA has built that uses the same type of propulsion as Rods to fly on Mars. Had the professors and students known about this NASA model; all that time spent on those bogus wind tunnel tests "debunking Rod flight" would not wasted time they could have spent on the real evidence. Again spin feeding you what you are "only allowed" to see.
5). They also left out the IMAX Rod shot in 3D. This footage reveals a Rod in an IMAX film shot by two IMAX "FILM" cameras on FILM that would give us, size, velocity, distance from the cameras and the other objects in the scene, but they NEVER got into it. WHY? Because it would disrupt their spin fed conclusion to YOU the numbers of gullible people that make up the demographics that their sponsors pay millions of dollars for to deliver you the non-truths!
6). They also left out the IMAX footage taken above the Fjords of Norway, with snow high up at 4800 feet above sea level again shot on IMAX FILM, where no insect in the world would appear and this is FILM...NOT interlaced video footage.
Why did they do this? Because it would not "fit" their spinning of the truth.
I should have known better. The last program that "never gave me a script or screener" was PROOF POSITIVE. Remember that name! It also claims to investigate scientifically and they also were given ALL the evidence, but guess what? They left everything out and spin fed you their BS.
7). The final segment on Monster Quest made me furious! Had I known they were planning to do this, I would have made them do it the right way. Oh that's right, I was never shown the script. This was the high speed and regular camera tests. This was where The History Channel and Monster Quest deliberately deceived their viewing audiences. They did all these tests "at night!" Do you know why? Because this requires "low shutter settings" on cameras and as I have said "over and over and over again" the past thirteen years of Rods research, NEVER SHOOT at the low shutter settings. You will be fooled.
Well The History Channel and Monster Quest are the fools, NOT us because no matter how many times they will deceive you, when I finally get the funding I've needed all these years, I will give The History Channel, Monster Quest, Proof Positive and all the others that have deliberately spinned the truth the "monkey spanking" they deserve.
For The History Channel executives and the sponsors of their shows, I am VERY disappointed in you. How dare YOU decieve the American public using a forum and venue contrived to sway people from the real evidences that exist on this planet.
It's networks like you and productions like Monster Quest that have kept everything neatly under wraps.
I am not letting you get away with it. I may be an under funded researcher and documentor right now and can't afford the equipment and processing of the IMAX films and licenses I need, but at least I have the integrity in delivering the real evidence to the public.
Obviously we cannot depend "even on The History Channel" which to my shock and dismay was the only channel I thought had the integrity and honesty to at least allow me to present all that YOU "their viewers" deserve to see. Man, was I ever wrong about that one.
I suppose I will get the threats from their lawyers to remove this from my web site or else. That's typical but they're still being held accountable for being paid by their sponsors to lie to their viewers. This is something they can't deny until they present ALL there is to the Rods phenomena.
[ Jose Escamilla ]
Abi
![[Pilt: 4dcubepov.gif]](http://www.mathematik.com/4DCube/4dcubepov.gif)
