Postitused: 1,875
Teemad: 122
Liitus: Jul 2005
I discovered, that someone called "Satakas" (I wonder who
) has posted my photos into a international forum. International skeptics forum.
Seems, that this "Satakas" is pretty disappointed, for getting no skeptical explenation for that phonemen.
Topic is here:
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=153581
The original photos that started this conversation, were taken on Tallinn- Helsinki ferry. August 2008.
http://galerii.para-web.org/albums/userp...lke013.jpg
http://galerii.para-web.org/albums/userp...lke011.jpg
[Muudetud: 15-11-2009 Tom]
[Muudetud: 16-11-2009 Tom]
Postitused: 1,875
Teemad: 122
Liitus: Jul 2005
Some say, that it could be:
Some sort of optical interference
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interferenc...opagation)
Or diffraction of a rain drop -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction
Or coherence -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coherence_(..._coherence
Or a reflection on the glass infront of the camera....
Postitused: 667
Teemad: 11
Liitus: Oct 2009
Tsitaat:Algselt postitas Tom
Some say, that it could be:
Some sort of optical interference http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interferenc...opagation)
Or diffraction of a rain drop - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction
Or coherence - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coherence_(..._coherence
Or a reflection on the glass infront of the camera....
Which is it then? Or are they all speculations without any solid base? I mean, the pictures were awesome
But if you never altered them in any way then... Well, the symbol is worth studying
Postitused: 3,609
Teemad: 58
Liitus: Sep 2007
Tsitaat:Which is it then? Or are they all speculations without any solid base?
Well...that's the problem with those kind of photos - there's rarely any solid base for anything, all you can do is try to speculate and from these speculations find the most probable one...
"Mida saab väita ilma tõenditeta, saab ka ilma tõenditeta kõrvale heita"
- Christopher Hitchens
Postitused: 667
Teemad: 11
Liitus: Oct 2009
Tsitaat:Algselt postitas Nielander
Tsitaat:Which is it then? Or are they all speculations without any solid base?
Well...that's the problem with those kind of photos - there's rarely any solid base for anything, all you can do is try to speculate and from these speculations find the most probable one...
And what do you think is the most probable speculation?
Postitused: 3,609
Teemad: 58
Liitus: Sep 2007
It's kinda early for that...
...but I wouldn't mind if someone more at home in optics(and general physics) would take a look..clearly it's too regular shaped to be a actual flying object...I speculate that there is a correlation between the rainbow, camera lens and the object(as if some sort of optical illusion)...but yeah, who knows...
"Mida saab väita ilma tõenditeta, saab ka ilma tõenditeta kõrvale heita"
- Christopher Hitchens
Postitused: 667
Teemad: 11
Liitus: Oct 2009
A UFO looking like a Minolta sign
But who knows what it is... Interesting photos anyway
Postitused: 11,429
Teemad: 172
Liitus: Apr 2007
Maybe its other way around - UF O looks like Minolta sign ...
[Muudetud: 11-16-2009 excubitoris]
Postitused: 667
Teemad: 11
Liitus: Oct 2009
Tsitaat:Algselt postitas excubitoris
Maybe its other way around - UF O looks like Minolta sign ...
[Muudetud: 11-16-2009 excubitoris]
So, this Minolta sign looks like a UFO
Great! That must mean that the creators of the Minolta sign know smth...
I do not believe in coincidences.
Postitused: 1,875
Teemad: 122
Liitus: Jul 2005
Good news everybody,
I got a confirmation from the author of this original picture. He confessed, that it's fake
. Reflection from a window, like skeptics suggested.
Postitused: 667
Teemad: 11
Liitus: Oct 2009
Tsitaat:Algselt postitas Tom
Good news everybody,
I got a confirmation from the author of this original picture. He confessed, that it's fake . Reflection from a window, like skeptics suggested.