Teema hinnang:
  • 0Hääli - 0 keskmine
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Elektriline universum
#1
Kahjuks on see huvitav lugu inglise keeles. Aga kes aru saab see loeb. Teised peavad ootama kuni asi saab maakeelde ümberpanduks. Link on aga selline koos piltidega

Tsitaat:Electricity Powers the Universe

by James P. Hogan

Electricity is an immensely more powerful force than gravity, and far more complex in the ways it interacts with matter. Yet modern astronomy remains wedded to a belief in gravity as the dominant mover and shaper of the universe, and seeks to explain new observations in terms that conceptually go back hundreds of years. James Hogan describes an emerging alternative theory that recognizes the important role played by electricity on cosmic scales, offering explanations based on principles that are well understood and demonstrable in laboratories, without need of recourse to unobserved, untestable physics or speculative mathematical abstractions.

Humans have a wonderful ability for creating visions of ways to improve themselves, thereby making the world a better place; and then, it seems, for losing track somewhere along the way of turning the visions into reality.

Take the business of science, for instance. After several thousand futile years of fighting wars over whose revealed truth was really true, and attempts to impose truth by decree with the aid of rack and thumbscrew or deduce it via rigorous logic from self-evident premises that nobody could agree on, the idea finally emerged that a better way of finding out about the way things are in the world might be to stop fixating on how they ought to be, actually look at what's out there, and accept what it's telling you, whether you like it or not. It works pretty well with such questions as figuring out why cannon balls and planets move the way they do, what heat is, and other matters that can be decided beyond argument according to whether your motor starts or not, or if your plane gets off the ground – all of which rapidly become engineering. But when it comes to issues that aren't settled so easily – the meaning and origin of life; how the cosmos gets to be the way it is, and where it came from: areas where authority can still command and get away with it – things don't seem to have really changed that much. Powerful establishments enjoying political favor and monopoly privileges in teaching and promotion rigidify into orthodoxies defending their beliefs tenaciously, with dissenting views being dismissed, ridiculed, and marginalized, even when supported by what would appear to be verifiable fact and simpler arguments. In possibly an ultimate of ironies, in areas where hopes for science were at their highest, instead of showing the openness to alternatives and readiness to follow the evidence wherever it pointed that were supposed to characterize the new way of understanding the world, much of what we hear today seems to be taking on more the trappings of intolerant religion protecting dogma and putting down heresy.

More than ninety-nine percent of the observed universe exists in the form of matter known as plasma. In the atoms that make up the planet we live on, equal amounts of positive and negative electric charge are confined together and cancel each other out, resulting in objects like rocks and cabbages that are neutral on balance and hence "feel" only the force of gravity. Plasma, by contrast, consists, fully or in part, of charged particles – negative "electrons" and positive "ions" (an atom missing one or more of its electrons) – that are separated, and hence respond to electric and magnetic forces. The electric force between two charged particles, which can be attractive or repulsive, is thirty-nine orders of magnitude stronger than the gravitational attraction between them. That's a one followed by 39 zeros. Such a number boggles the imagination. It is in the order of a millionth of a millimeter compared to 10,000 times the size of the known universe. Even in a plasma comprising just one charged particle in 10,000 – which would be typical of the interstellar clouds of dust and gas from which stars are formed – electromagnetic forces will dominate gravity by a factor of ten million to one. Yet, conceptually, the prevailing view of the cosmos remains essentially rooted in the work of such names as Kepler, Newton, and Laplace, whose laws describe a mechanical universe made up of neutral bodies moving in a vacuum under the influence of gravity. And today's reigning cosmological model, founded on general relativity, is essentially a theory of geometry manifesting itself as gravity.

Gravity-based models were reasonable two hundred and more years ago, when Newtonian dynamics was shown to predict precisely the motions of the Solar System. The plasma that permeates interplanetary space was unknown, along with its ability to organize spontaneously into isolating sheaths that, under stable and tranquil conditions like those prevailing in our locality at the present time, screen planets from electrical forces. And not a lot was understood about electricity in any case. But more recent advances in observational astronomy have revealed phenomena that do not lend themselves readily to explanation in familiar gravitational terms. Pulsars – rapidly varying stellar objects conventionally interpreted as spinning neutron stars – have now been measured to fluctuate at rates that call into question even the power of postulated neutron matter to hold together. Quasars, if accepted in accordance with the customary reading of red-shift as being the most distant objects known, radiate energy with intensities that defy explanation by any process involving conventional matter. The way galaxies rotate, and their violent ejections of matter jets, do not conform to expectations based on gravity. To account for these and other anomalies, such speculative devices as "dark matter" – at the last count numbering seven different varieties – "dark energy," matter collapsing into black holes, and similar exotic mechanisms that have never been observed are introduced to make the theory fit the facts.

Seeking to explain new findings in familiar terms is natural and represents a desirable economy of thought. Models that have become standard were not lightly arrived at and should not lightly be cast aside. However, as was seen with the ever-more elaborate systems of epicycles contrived to keep the Ptolemaic system alive for long after a change of thinking was called for, such conservatism can be taken too far. There comes a point where, "We don't need another theory, because the one we've got can be made to fit the data," is saying more about human inventive ingenuity than the accuracy of the theory.

Over the last two hundred years an enormous amount has been learned about electricity. Technology has gone from Faraday motors and hand-cranked Wimhurst machines to super computers and satellite communications. In parallel with these advances, electrical theorists have developed an alternative paradigm for interpreting astronomical observations, based on principles that are well understood and can be demonstrated in any electrical or plasma laboratory. It requires none of the esoteric physics or ad-hoc inventions that the mainstream has had to resort to repeatedly when new observations failed to match expectations, or were never anticipated at all, and it is proving to be more powerful predictively. Proponents refer to it as Electric Universe theory. Its basic premise is that what we're seeing when we point telescopes at new stars being born or violently energetic events deforming distant galaxies are not results of gravity being intensified unimaginably and behaving in strange and unheard of ways, but electricity. Where electrical forces are operating, gravity effectively ceases to exist. A tiny magnet will snap a nail up effortlessly against the gravitational pull of the entire Earth. You don't have to keep your coffee pot below the wall outlet to enable the electrons to fall down through the cord.

Around the turn of the nineteenth century, the Norwegian physicist Kristian Birkeland studied the northern auroras and concluded that they are caused by charged particles from the Sun being directed to the polar regions by the Earth's magnetic field, where they excite atoms of the upper atmosphere to light-emission energies. This was not favorably received by the theoreticians of his day, whose mathematical models treated the Earth as an isolated object in space, and his work was largely ignored. Although satellite measurements have since confirmed the existence of interplanetary plasma and Earth's complex environment of fields, particles, and currents, there is still an entrenched reluctance to accept them as parts of electrical circuitry that not only connects the Earth to the Sun, but spans the entire Solar System.

Recognition of space as pervaded by plasma, and hence able to conduct electric currents, is what distinguishes the electrical model of the universe. Electric currents create magnetic fields, which induce secondary currents, which in turn produce their own fields. The complex interplays of forces that result can give rise to amazingly intricate structures and behaviors of matter. Currents in plasma flow as elongated filaments, which can be visible in instances like auroral displays and lightning, where energies become high enough to initiate electrical discharge. Parallel filaments are pulled together in an effect known as a "pinch," which can be very powerful. At shorter ranges, however, the net force between the filaments becomes repulsive rather than attractive, causing them to rotate and twist around each other into a braided structure as they approach, instead of merging. The braid can interact with similar braids to form "ropes" on a larger scale, which might then repeat the process.


Electric currents in space. The Double Helix nebula, located near our own galactic center.

Such braided structures are the signature of electric currents in plasmas. They have been shown to scale up through an astonishing fourteen orders of magnitude. Effects produced on a microscopic scale in laboratories can be observed unfolding at cosmological dimensions.


Sub-millimeter-size tornadoes of current produced by the Plasma Focus, a fusion research device, compared to a Hubble image of the planetary nebula NGC 6751

The standard model of star formation has stars condensing from an accretion disk of dust and gas as it contracts under self-gravitation. It has remained essentially unchanged for two hundred years despite having a number of problems. For a start, simulations and calculation indicate that peripheral matter in such a disk would disperse rather than coalesce into planetary clumps. Then there's the question of how the angular momentum – the property that makes a flywheel want to keep turning – comes to be concentrated in the planets – 98 percent of it in the case of our Solar System. A contracting disk should deliver most of its angular momentum to the central part, giving the Sun a rotation period of something like 13 hours instead of the 28 days that it has. And further, where did it all came from to begin with? Dispersed matter initially moving randomly should contain very little net angular momentum. Finally, for a star the size of the Sun, gravitational contraction won't produce a high enough density at the core to generate the temperature necessary for igniting the fusion reactions generally believed to be the power source. To make it work, various quantum mechanical improbabilities are wheeled in to allow things to happen that all the odds say shouldn't.

Stars are concentrated along the spiral arms of galaxies, which is also where new stars come into existence. The electric model proposes the arms to be the paths of currents traversing the galactic disk, and stars as the focal points of pinches occurring between them, strung like beads on threads. Electrical forces offer a far more effective means than gravity for gathering, compressing, and heating dispersed material. And, from what was said earlier, rotation is no longer an anomaly in need of explanation, but imparted naturally as a result of the process. Here's an example of where you can see it happening.


The Butterfly nebula. Embedded current cylinders converging and producing plasma glow discharge over a distance greater than the diameter of our Solar System. The close-up of the neck shows a dusty toroid occluding the central star. The physics of plasmas predicts such a torus.

On a larger scale, the same process explains galaxies. Electric galaxies were first proposed by the Swedish Nobel laureate Hannes Alfvén in the middle of the last century, who envisioned immense rivers of electricity flowing through space, of intergalactic extent.


Sequence from a supercomputer simulation at Los Alamos National Laboratories of the structure arising from a pinch between two plasma currents. Above, a real galaxy for comparison.

Galaxies don't rotate in the way that predictions from gravity-based cosmology say they should. With the amount of observed mass and the velocities measured at the rim, they ought to be flying apart. The solution of choice is to invoke "dark matter," never actually observed, but which can be given just the right properties and put in just the right places to produce the desired results. It has been called "cosmic duct tape" – capable of fixing anything. By contrast, the electric model holds that, far from being isolated, passive accumulations of mass revolving under their own momentum after being spun up by some unexplained cause, galaxies are active components in enormous cosmic power circuits. They're not flywheels, but motors, driven by forces easily able to hold them together without need of invisible glue. Inventing unobservables to hold up failed predictions is usually the sign of a theory in trouble.

Galaxies are not distributed evenly through space, but concentrated in strings and "walls" around voids that can be thousands of light-years across. According to the standard theory, structures of that size shouldn't have had time to form in the 14 billion years since everything was supposed to have started with the Big Bang. But it's what would be expected if galaxies result from cosmic electric currents, because currents flow in filaments and sheets of filaments – the veils of the polar auroras, for example. The cosmology developed by Alfvén and his intellectual descendants proposes an earlier plasma epoch in the evolution of the cosmos, in which electromagnetic forces played the initial role of collecting matter together to create the densities that enabled gravity to become a significant factor only later, making the 14 billion years no longer an issue.

Many galaxies are found to be shooting out enormous jets of matter and energy in the direction of their axes, often on scales that dwarf the galaxy itself. The rotating system of currents converging on the axis, along with its associated magnetic fields, stores enormous amounts of energy. Releases due to instabilities or the need to shed excess from an accumulating buildup would manifest themselves in just this kind of way.


Radio Galaxy 1313-192. Jets emitted by the visible galaxy power the x-ray emitting lobes. Such lobes were predicted by Hannes Alfvén long before radio sources were discovered.

A gravitational explanation of such energies requires postulating black holes to concentrate to almost infinite density the weakest force known to physics, and the creation of jets through unclear processes involving acceleration and mechanical collisions in accretion disks of matter spiraling into them. Despite widely repeated claims to the contrary, black holes have never been observed. What is observed are enormously energetic events occurring in space. Attributing them to black holes is part of the assumed basis for interpretation. The way engineers and researchers produce x-rays is by accelerating charged particles with electric fields. Your dentist doesn't do it by banging rocks together.


Jet emerging from galaxy M87 extends for thousands of light-years. Electrical structures remain coherent over such distances, whereas neutral gas would rapidly disperse. The glow is consistent with electrically accelerated electrons spiraling along magnetic field lines.

The term "plasma" was co-opted from biology in recognition of the eerily lifelike forms and changes observed in electrical discharge experiments with ionized gases. Besides forming filaments, braids, sheets, and isolating layers, plasmas will organize into cellular structures bounding regions possessing different properties such as temperature, density, and chemistry. The Cat's Eye nebula shows the kind of complexity that can result.

And this is the core region, with the star at its center.

So what are we seeing? Gravity, which produces formless coagulations of matter like clots in cream? Or electricity?

Some suggested web sites for further information on the Electric Universe:

* www.holoscience.com
* www.thunderbolts.info
* www.plasmaresources.com
* http://public.lanl.gov/alp/plasma/TheUniverse.html
* www.kronia.com

July 30, 2008

James P. Hogan [send him mail], a former digital systems engineer and computer sales executive, has been a full-time writer since 1980. He was born in London, moved to the USA for many years, and now lives in the Republic of Ireland. His web site is at www.jamesphogan.com.

Copyright © 2008 LewRockwell.com
Vasta
#2
Kas keegi on hakanud juba tõlkima? ei tahaks nagu topelt teha, aga kui olen esimene, paneks selle tõlke enda nimele kinni Smile .
Vasta
#3
Lase käi, Korts!
Lisanduseks märkus, et (jättes kõrvale gravitatsiooni) loetakse (üldiselt) meie Universumit märksa enam "magnetiliseks" kui "elektriliseks". Põhjuseks asjaolu, et magnetväli on elektriväljaga võrreldes märksa "vintskem vennikene", mis omakorda seotud asjaoluga, et eksiteerivad elektrilaengud, magnetlaenguid aga (senini veel?) ei tunta. Väline elektriväli (elektriline pinge) paneb elektrilaengud kohe liikuma, mille tulemusel (kui kuidagi ei hoolitseta laengute pideva juurdetoomise-äraviimise eest) esialgne pinge kaob. "Kodune" näide on hästituntud püsimagnetid (magnetiliselt polariseeritud materjalid), samas kui nende elektrilised analoogid (elektretid - elektriliselt polariseeritud materjalid), on märksa vähemtuntud (ja ebastabiilsemad).

Aga võimalik, et elektrinähtused Universumis on mõnes kohas ka teenimatult tähelepanu alt välja jäänud. Lugege Kortsu tõlget ja mõtelge!
Vasta
#4
Elektrivälja ja gravitatsiooni jõu suhe on 10x astmel 39 (ehk 10 millel on 38 nulli järgi) tugevam - paneb nagu mõtlema, et mis on siis tugevam ?

1000000000000000000000000000000000000000 <- vohh - nii palju kordi on elektriväljad võimsamad Smile
Vasta
#5
Hakkasin vaikselt tõlkima. Ütlen ette ära, et ma pole inglise keele geenius, mul ei ole päevade kaupa vaba aega ja võõrkeelsed võõrsõnad ei ole ka just kerged, et tõlkega läheb aega ja kui valmis saab, ei pruugi see ka väga täpne olla. Loodan siiski, et jääte rahule Bleh
Vasta
#6
Tsitaat:Algselt postitas: excubitoris
Elektrivälja ja gravitatsiooni jõu suhe on 10x astmel 39 (ehk 10 millel on 38 nulli järgi) tugevam - paneb nagu mõtlema, et mis on siis tugevam ?
No siin küll pikka mõtlemist pole! Smile See peaks (kui ma õieti mäletan) siis olema elektriliste ja gravitatsiooniliste jõudude suhe, millega kaks elektroni teineteist mõjutavad (see suhe ei sõltu kaugusest, kuna mõlemad jõud kahanevad kaugusega sama moodi). Aga edasi tulevad mõned muud elektriliste ja gravitatsioonijõudude erinevused, mis megamaailmas (kosmilistes mastaapides) selle suhte hoopis peapeale keeravad. Gravitatsioonijõud on alati tõmbejõud ja põhjustab seega osakesete tõmbumist ja aine kuhjumist ning massi kasvamist, mille tulemusel jõud (võrdeliselt massiga) üha kasvab. Elektrilised jõud võivad olla nii tõmbejõud (erinimeliste laengute vahel) kui ka tõukejõud (samanimeliste laengute vahel). Viimaste tõttu on raskendatud samanimeliste laengute kuhjumine ja seega elektrilise kogulaengu kasv - aine lihtsalt ei seisaks siis koos vaid lendaks tükkideks. Erinimeliste laengute lähenemine elektriliste tõmbejõudude mõjul põhjustab aga summaarse laengu kahenenemist (+ ja - annavad kokku 0) ja seega elektriliste jõudude nõrgenemist.
Vasta
#7
Hallu elame näeme Smile
Vasta
#8
Tsitaat:Algselt postitas: excubitoris
Hallu elame näeme Smile
No seda ikka loodaks. Sina küllap mõneti kauem ja rohkem kui mina, aga mõnda loodaks isegi! Aga mida Sa konkreetselt silmas pidasid? Ega ma ju midagi Su pikas tsitaadis kahtluse alla ei seadnud (ega ma seda veel nii põhjalikult uurinud kah). Või leidsid Sina minu väidetes midagi kahtlast?
Vasta
#9
Üks kuuendik on tõlgitud... Seda posti uuendan iga tõlkimis-sessiooni järgselt, hoidke silma peal Bleh

PS! Ma tean, asi läheb aeglaselt, aga siin on KOHUTAVALT keerulised lausekonstruktsioonid, rääkimata veel sõnadest.
Vasta
#10
Tsitaat: Või leidsid Sina minu väidetes midagi kahtlast?


Ei midagi kahtlast. Kuna pole ise füüsikas ja seda tüüpi asjades "kõva käsi" siis eeldan vähemalt, et sa ei valeta vaid räägid nii nagu tead ja nagu tänapäeva ametlik teadus tõeks peab. Ei midagi isiklikku sinu vastu. Kuid elu on näidanud, et paljud dogmad muutuvad ning olen aru saanud, et teaduses on rohkem dogmasi kui tõdesi. Sellest ka fraas "elame näeme" - ehk kui piisavalt kaua elada siis näeb kas see elektri teooria kaob, jääb peale või moodustavad nad mingi loogilise terviku.
Vasta
#11
http://www.thunderbolts.info/mmarchives/..._bavgs.htm

Üks tore postitus - tsitaadid nii Newtonilt kui ka Einsteinilt.
Vasta
#12
Tsitaat:Algselt postitas: excubitoris
http://www.thunderbolts.info/mmarchives/..._bavgs.htm
Üks tore postitus - tsitaadid nii Newtonilt kui ka Einsteinilt.

Jah, muidugi on elekter üks tore asi (Ma tahaks näha, kes julgeb vastu vaielda!). Aga edasi lähevad asjad minu jaoks segasemaks. Sest seal Newtoni ja Einsteini vahel oli ju veel Maxwell, kes kogu selle elektriasjanduse kohta üldised omanimelised võrrandid kirja pani, mille järgi kõike kenasti arvutada annab (nojah, ilmaruumi asjade jaoks on sinna veel plasma olekuvõrrandit vaja, aga ega seegi mingi ainult taevaste tarkus ole). Ja edasi polegi mulle päriselt selge, kas siis
1. Elektrilise Universumi mehed nii neid oma asju arvutavadki, aga keegi (pahad teadlased ikka) ei taha nende arvutusi uskuda.
2. Elktrilise Universumi mehed arvavad, et ega selle matemaatikaga polegi eriti midagi peale hakata, segab ainult inimestel asjadest arusaamist ja nemad teavad niigi, kuidas ajad tegelikult on aga keegi (pahad teadlased ikka) ei taha neid uskuda.
Ja päris lõpus (tunnitan ausalt, et see oli üks väga vähestest nii pikkadest videotest, mille olen viitsinud läbi vaadata) oli üks suht libe koht - see on see, kus klikkide arvu abil tõestati, et see Elektrilise Universumi teooria ikka üks palju parem teooria on kui mõni teine. Arvaks, et pole keeruline tõestada, et pornograafia nendest kõigist mäekõrguselt veel parem teooria on! Smile
Vasta
#13
Kui kahte objekti piisavalt usinasti teiseteise vastu nühkida, tekib staatiline elekter. See oli 7. klassi füüsika. Laugh
Vasta
#14
Tsitaat:Algselt postitas: Liine
piisavalt usinasti
Nujah, tööarmastust tuleb ju maast-madalast ... Smile

Aga siit edasi: võta seesamune kamm ja mõned paberitükid (ja juuksed on Sul küllap omast peast võtta - erinevalt mõnest Laugh) ja katsu nende vahenditega mulle Coulombi seadus (no see elektrilaengute vahelis jõu kohta) tuletada. Mulle mõnikord tundub, et me umbes sarnaste vahenditega püüame "teispoolsuse" seadusi ära arvata.
Vasta
#15
Hallu - ära võitle võitluse enda pärast. Olen kergelt lugenud nii ühtesi kui teisi ning ausalt see EU inimeste loogika tundub mulle tunduvalt tervem kui paljude teiste oma. Kui siia lisada Einsteini, Newtoni ja PALJUDE teiste - just vanade "klassikute" ütlused - millest osad olid ka selles videos ära toodud - siis vähemalt esialgu arvan, et see teooria on väärt edasist arutlemist. Kõige arukam selle asja juures on aga minu meelest see, et erinevalt "klassikutest" promovad need inimesed, et maailma koosneb ikka mitmetest asjadest ning tihti, et aru saada ühest süsteemist tuleb vaadelda mitmeid - esmapilgul erinevaid süsteeme KOOS.

Jahh - see weebilehe külastajate võrdlus ei jätnud ka mulle mitte kõige paremat muljet, kuid see on muu asja juures kõrvaline.
Vasta
#16
Klassikaline kosmoloogia on jälle ummikus - suured augud Maa magnetosfääris.
Vasta
#17
David Talbott | Exposing the Myths of &quot;Settled Science&quot; - YouTube
See esitlus on pühendatud siis kõigile neile pimeda teaduse pimedatele jüngritele kes spetsialiseeruvad ühele kitsale erialale ja ei suuda puude tagant näha metsa.
Elektriline universum on teooria mis seletab komsose jõude mitte hetkel primaarse jõu gravitatsiooni abil vaid väidab, et elektrilised protsessid on põhjuseks ja alsueks mis tekitab ka gravitatsiooni jõu. Mitmed vaatlused on näidanud, et Universumis toimuvad protsessid on pigem eetrlised-elektrilised kui termodünaamilised. Kui meil siin planeedil algas termotuumajastu nii 1950ndatel siis teadlased lubasid, et 20 aasta jooksul suudavad nad luua juhitava termotuuma reaktsiooni - aatomipommi plahvatus on juhitamatu reaktsioon - ja sellest ajast saati on ad kuni tänase päevani seda "20 aasta" piiri edasi nihutanud.
Kuid lootust ei ole vaja kaotada - üsna hiljuti on hakanud vaikselt lehtedes ilmuma nupuke mis räägib sellest, et see "suur pauk" ei olnudki nii suur ja Universumi laienemist ei toimu. Sisuliselt tähendab see aga seda, et teadus hakkab "järele" jõudma neile suurtele interdistsiplinaarsetele teadlastele kes formuleerisid ka näiteks eetri mõsite kui kõike siduva jõu mis ühendab Universumi erinevaid osasi - ka Inimese Tähtedega.
Vasta
#18
Mnjah, lööge parem otsingusse Tesla ja saate midagi väga põnevat eetrimaailmade kohta, aine kohta mis on algallikaks kõikidele aine teistele olekutele, mina kahjuks loen seda hoolega vene keeles, sest nõuka ajal oli osa eetrimaailma uuringutest lubatud, alles Jeltsini ja kommunismiprojekti üleandmise ajal lõpetati kogu Einsteini vastase teaduse rahastamine ja projektid pisteti seifidesse või rändasid koos teadlastega Iisraeli ja Ameerikasse. Kardan, et materjali on vene keeles rohkem kui inglise keeles.
Vasta
#19
(18-11-2013, 14:54 )VironShaman Kirjutas: Mnjah, lööge parem otsingusse Tesla ja saate midagi väga põnevat eetrimaailmade kohta, aine kohta mis on algallikaks kõikidele aine teistele olekutele, mina kahjuks loen seda hoolega vene keeles, sest nõuka ajal oli osa eetrimaailma uuringutest lubatud, alles Jeltsini ja kommunismiprojekti üleandmise ajal lõpetati kogu Einsteini vastase teaduse rahastamine ja projektid pisteti seifidesse või rändasid koos teadlastega Iisraeli ja Ameerikasse. Kardan, et materjali on vene keeles rohkem kui inglise keeles.

Siin kohal VS iga nõus. Tuleb tõesti ka väga põnevat ja huvitavat infot. Samuti soovitan vaadata tänast ETV saadet ringvaade. Peaks olema ETV lehel kordusena vaadatav.
Vasta
#20
Selline asi nagu - tokamak. Oli tähelepanu keskmes juba palju aastaid tagasi. Selle arendamisega tegelesid eriti prantslased.
Ei ole olnud midagi kuulda enam sellest.
http://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak

Lisan veel seda, et elekter, magnetism ja ka gravitatsioon on sellised asjad milles inimkonnal on minna veel pikk tee.
Kõigest 100 aastat ümmarguselt on inimkond tegelenud selle uurimisega.
Vasta
#21
(15-08-2013, 23:15 )excubitoris Kirjutas: David Talbott | Exposing the Myths of &quot;Settled Science&quot; - YouTube
See esitlus on pühendatud siis kõigile neile pimeda teaduse pimedatele jüngritele kes spetsialiseeruvad ühele kitsale erialale ja ei suuda puude tagant näha metsa.
Elektriline universum on teooria mis seletab komsose jõude mitte hetkel primaarse jõu gravitatsiooni abil vaid väidab, et elektrilised protsessid on põhjuseks ja alsueks mis tekitab ka gravitatsiooni jõu. Mitmed vaatlused on näidanud, et Universumis toimuvad protsessid on pigem eetrlised-elektrilised kui termodünaamilised. Kui meil siin planeedil algas termotuumajastu nii 1950ndatel siis teadlased lubasid, et 20 aasta jooksul suudavad nad luua juhitava termotuuma reaktsiooni - aatomipommi plahvatus on juhitamatu reaktsioon - ja sellest ajast saati on ad kuni tänase päevani seda "20 aasta" piiri edasi nihutanud.
Kuid lootust ei ole vaja kaotada - üsna hiljuti on hakanud vaikselt lehtedes ilmuma nupuke mis räägib sellest, et see "suur pauk" ei olnudki nii suur ja Universumi laienemist ei toimu. Sisuliselt tähendab see aga seda, et teadus hakkab "järele" jõudma neile suurtele interdistsiplinaarsetele teadlastele kes formuleerisid ka näiteks eetri mõsite kui kõike siduva jõu mis ühendab Universumi erinevaid osasi - ka Inimese Tähtedega.

No aga Excu - kui sa räägid mingitest aastakümnetest siis tekib küsimus, kas sa ei võtaks kõike veidi laiemalt?
Muidugi olen ma nõus sinuga selles osas et universum on eksisteerinud igavesest ajast tänaseni.
Mina ei usu ka mingit suurt pauku. Ega inimene ju ei hoomagi mis on AEG.
Minu arvamus on et tähed sünnivad ja surevad ja nii on see olnud igavesest ajast igavesti. Nii ka jääb.
Need mõnedsajad aastad mil inimkond on ennast teadvustanud on köömes selles igavikus.
No nüüd läks jutt küll liiga "targaks".
Ma lisaks veel seda, et me võime nimetada universumit elektriliseks jne. kuid see on vaid meie väljund, kes me midagi ei tea.
Tulgem nüüd oma mõistuse juurde - nii palju kui seda meil on. Mõelgem universumi suuruse üle ja oma väikeste probleemide üle.
Siis saate ka aru kui väikesed teie kõik need probleemid on. Universumi mastaabis.
Mõelgem siis mastaapsemalt - näiteks - minu väike mure hetkel läheb tõesti korda kõigele kõiksusele. Jumalale.
Nii ongi. Iga mõte omab võimu ja muudab maailma milles elame!
Oleme üks tervik!
Hea oleks kui keegi seda mõistaks. Ega minagi seda ei ole mõistnud sünnijärgselt.
Olen selleni jõudnud elu jooksul siin materiaalses maailmas.
Vasta
#22
Kui see uudis tõele vastab,siis peaks selle Excu alustatud ¨Elektrilise universumi¨ teema ehk taaselustama-
Mysterious Comet “Kill Shot” For California Warned Coming In Days After Alaska Mega-Quake
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2478.htm
Komeet 41P/Tuttle–Giacobini–Kresák
mis paar kuud tagasi aeglustas oma kiirust teadmata põhjusel on nüüd asunud maa ja päikesega¨elektrilisse kontakti¨ ja selle tulemusel tekitab maavärinaid maamunal.Hiljutine Alaska 8.2 palline maav2rin olla selle tulemus olnud.Komeet ise peaks aprilli algul binokli/pikksilma abil vaadatav olema-

Sellist teooriat polegi varem kuulnud,et suur kanjon ameerikas olla tekkinud Veenuse ja Maa vahel toimunud elektritormist vms...Kui kanjoni kuju võrrelda elektritabamuse saanud objekti või isegi inimese naha mustrit siis sarnasusi seal nagu oleks...
Momendil ei leia linki kuskohast seda teooriat lugesin ja ajanappuse tõttu pikalt ei kannata kirjutada.
Uurimist väärt teema igaljuhul.


Vasta
#23

Vasta
#24
Dokumentaalproject teemasse.
Electric Universe Complete Gaia Series (2019) [720p]
https://concen.org/content/electric-univ...-2019-720p
Vasta
  


Võimalikud seotud teemad...
Teema: Autor Vastuseid: Vaatamisi: Viimane postitus
  Miks tekkis universum, milleks ja kuidas, mis oli enne seda hiidlane 161 99,393 23-03-2023, 19:07
Viimane postitus: Mannu
  Meie kaunis Päikesesüsteem ja Universum Tutanhamon 80 35,075 25-12-2021, 11:31
Viimane postitus: igaviklane
  Kas universum on analoogne või digitaalne ehk holograafiline? xcad 53 8,607 23-11-2021, 15:36
Viimane postitus: xcad
  Füüsiline reaalsus on illusioon ja kogu universum on hologramm Pohlatohlakas 155 97,615 17-06-2020, 12:22
Viimane postitus: xcad
  Universum on lihtsalt millegi suurema osa?! TheDarkest 25 11,904 17-09-2018, 11:34
Viimane postitus: Müstik
  Universum on lõpmatu? NRG 346 116,173 16-02-2013, 23:54
Viimane postitus: alisoman
  Universum tulevikus? miraioh 26 12,717 25-03-2012, 20:26
Viimane postitus: alisoman

Alamfoorumi hüpe:


Kasutaja, kes vaatavad seda teemat:
1 külali(st)ne

Expand chat